Private · local · evidence-governed
For teams that can't accept a plausible but uncited answer. Every answer comes with its source, its time bounds, and its proof — or Weryta says it doesn't know. Runs on your hardware; your documents stay yours.
What an answer looks like
A question about a procedure at a point in time. Weryta returns a verdict, the exact document section, the interval it was valid for, its status, and tamper-evident identifiers — or an honest Unknown. (Example uses illustrative data.)
Procedure-X was approved.
Procedure-X is approved[wk 5, wk 42)VerifiedDirect evidence · proof bundle sha256:…
No — the record shows the opposite at week 45.
Procedure-X is-not approved[wk 42, ∞)VerifiedEvidence of falsehood — not absence of evidence.
Four answers, never a bluff
The record directly supports it — with the source and the dates it held.
The record directly says the opposite — a withdrawal, a supersession.
No basis in the documents you gave it. It refuses to invent one.
An inference — shown with its rule and every parent fact, never as a stored fact.
Read both columns
Who it's for
Teams that live in technical procedures and version changes, administrative decisions, registers and deadlines, quality documentation, incident reports, maintenance procedures, or internal audits — where the real question is not "what's the answer" but "show me the document, the section, and the version that was in force that day."
When did someone last answer a question about a procedure, decision, or condition — but couldn't show the document, the section, and the version in force on that day?
Start a 25-minute conversation